<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHP::Interpreter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joseph.randomnetworks.com/archives/2005/08/23/phpinterpreter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joseph.randomnetworks.com/archives/2005/08/23/phpinterpreter/</link>
	<description>cat /dev/random</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:07:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-rare</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Linden</title>
		<link>http://joseph.randomnetworks.com/archives/2005/08/23/phpinterpreter/comment-page-1/#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Linden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joseph.randomnetworks.com/?p=463#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  But if reaching back into Perl is desirable, why not use HTML::Mason instead of PHP?  Mason allows you to embed Perl directly into your templates and access Perl libraries.

I know there&#039;s a lot of existing sites using PHP, but, for new sites, HTML::Mason might be a good pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  But if reaching back into Perl is desirable, why not use HTML::Mason instead of PHP?  Mason allows you to embed Perl directly into your templates and access Perl libraries.</p>
<p>I know there&#8217;s a lot of existing sites using PHP, but, for new sites, HTML::Mason might be a good pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
