Oracle Buys Innobase

Jeremy talks about Oracle buying Innobase, the folks behind InnoDB for MySQL. I don’t really have too much to add, I suspect most people are at least a little bit nervous at what Oracle might do to InnoDB development. Even if Oracle doesn’t do anything (one way or the other), this will certainly make people wonder about the future of InnoDB.

What attraction does Innobase have for Oracle? I doubt that it is their technology, even with everything that InnoDB has brought to MySQL, Oracle’s database does much more. I can’t image that share holders would like the idea of Oracle funding a competitor out of kindness. It is possible that they are mostly interested in the people/talent at Innobase, but if those folks start working on Oracle projects where does that leave InnoDB development?

Google Reader

Google has a web based feed reader: Google Reader (in beta of course). The most obvious question is, what does this mean for Bloglines? Only time will tell.

I was able to import my subscription list (in OPML format) from Bloglines into the Google Reader. The hardest part of this process was figuring out how to do that in Bloglines. I had to jump through three or four hoops before I got to an export link in Bloglines. They should have an export link in the extras section at the bottom of my subscription list where I read my feeds.

The UI in Google Reader is a little odd at first. The keyboard navigation is nice though. The two sorting options of relevance and date aren’t real clear though. I just want to read unread entries in feeds that I’m subscribed to most of the time, and relevance and date don’t convey that to me. Along with being able to keep an entry unread there are options to blog about the entry which is tied to their Blogger service. This is fine if you use Blogger and completely useless if you don’t. There is also an option to Gmail the entry, but when I tried that the page that it brought up only indicated an error. I’m going to assume that when it is working that will fire up a new message in your Gmail with a link and or the text of the entry already in the body of the message.

They’ve obviously put some thought into this, but I’m not sure that was translated into a really good product. Despite all of it’s problems one of the things that I like about the Bloglines UI is the ability at a glance to get a pretty good idea of which blogs have new entries without having to look too hard. The Google Reader UI is more zoomed in than that, so it isn’t immediately obvious how many feeds have unread entries. Its hard to pin down why, but this bothers me.

Weblogs.com and Weblogs, Inc. Sold

This seems to have been the week to announce purchases of blogs and blogging resources. First up, Weblogs, Inc. was sold to AOL. Later on we learned that Weblogs.com was sold to Verisign. Congrats to both Jason and Dave on these deals, they’ve both worked hard on these resources and deserve this success.

Both these deals have left me with more questions though. What does AOL see in Weblogs, Inc? Nothing against Weblogs, Inc, but AOL is huge, what attracted them enough to make a purchasing offer? And what is up with Dave Winer selling weblogs.com to Verisign? Verisign? As others have already noted it was certainly time to weblogs.com to be run with deeper pockets and Dave probably wants to move on and do other things. But Verisign? The company that has been considered evil for at least the last 10 years? I don’t trust Verisign and I won’t be surprised if they make some very foolish decisions over the next few years with weblogs.com.

New Website For FreeBSD

FreeBSD has just announced their website redesign. My first impression is that this looks much better than their old design. The one negative thing I’ve run into is the font size is a bit small in some areas, but this only happens on Firefox on the Mac. In everything else (Safari, Firefox & IE on Windows) the font size looks fine. Kudos to Emily Boyd for doing the work and Google’s Summer of Code for paying Emily to do it.

Working In A Terabyte World

It really is amazing how easy it is to put together a system with a terabyte (or more) of storage. For less than $500 you can purchase four Maxtor 300 Gigabyte IDE drives ($118 each from New Egg), putting you well over one terabyte in capacity. If you are looking for something a bit bigger Apple has made that pretty easy with their Xserve RAID unit, up to 7 terabytes for $13,000. I believe hard drive capacity will continue to go up and price per terabyte will drop.

At work I’ve got few systems now with a terabyte or more of storage. While most modern operating systems support filesystems in the terabyte range, their advanced features don’t seem to work well. FreeBSD had no problem running with a terabyte plus filesystem (fs), but snapshots on that fs were pretty much useless because they took forever. Still having to run fsck when problems happen would undoubtedly be equally as painful. Fortunately there has been talk of adding journaling to FreeBSD, hopefully that work will at least take care of the fsck problem. General work on large file systems under FreeBSD is being done as part of project Big Disk.

You might think that a company with more money than many countries (Microsoft) would be able to produce an OS (Windows 2003 Server) that wouldn’t have those sorts of issues, but you’d be wrong. Windows 2003 does fine using a one terabyte plus fs, until want to use things like Shadow Copy and then things start to fall apart rather quickly. From what I’ve been able to determine things work fine for awhile and then shadow copy stops working at some point after the system has been up for awhile. That wouldn’t be so bad if that was the only thing that went wrong, but it isn’t. In Windows 2003 the built in backup software makes use of shadow copy, which makes sense, if shadow copy didn’t roll over and die on large file systems. When ntbackup tries to create a shadow copy and that fails, ntbackup stops and the whole back up fails. Obviously that makes it rather difficult to get a clean backup, at least using ntbackup. But it gets even worse, when ntbackup fails because shadow copy fails it erases all of the old successful snapshots that shadow copy made earlier.

After hunting around for awhile I came across Article 833167 at support.microsoft.com claiming that there is a hotfix that is supposed to fix the problem, but it isn’t publicly available. I have to contact Microsoft support and request the hotfix, after which they’ll determine if they are going to charge me for said support. At some point I’ll have to bite the bullet and ask for the hotfix, but I get the feeling they don’t have a lot of confidence in it yet. How long until SP2 for Windows 2003 comes out? What ever it is I doubt that I can wait that long.

Given how easy and cheap it is to equip a system with a terabyte (or more) of hard drive space it is disappointing that some things don’t work better on that sort of scale.

MS Office 12 To "Support" PDF

Scoble is right, MS Office 12 supporting PDF is big. Having the ability to publish to PDF builtin into Office is a good thing. What’s funny about it is that now we get to make fun of Microsoft for doing the right thing. Usually we only get to make fun of them for not doing the right thing :-)

First off, as someone else has already pointed out, it is foolish for MS to limit this feature to just Office. This should be a builtin print feature system wide across all applications, similar to the way Mac OS X has been doing for years. If they wanted to take a short cut there are even a couple of open source apps that implement this, but some how I think a company with that much money in the bank isn’t short on resources.

Aside from the obvious jokes that will pop up about Microsoft coping Apple on this, there will also be jokes about Microsoft coping Open Office for this feature. Open Office has been able to publish in PDF format for awhile now.

If that isn’t enough fuel for the fire, here’s one more. From the announcement by Brian Jones:

I constantly get asked by customers if we can build in this support for publishing documents as PDF files, and now I can thankfully say “yes!” It’s something we’ve been hearing about for years, and earlier in this project we decided that while there were already existing third party tools for doing this, we should do the work to build the functionality natively into the product.

So customers having been requesting this feature “for years”, but Microsoft never acted on those requests. Further down Brian mentions one metric they used to track how much people wanted this feature:

In the case of PDF though, it was a really simple straightforward problem. Currently, on our OfficeOnline site, we are seeing over 30,000 searches per week for PDF support. That makes a pretty easy decision :-) … Of course we get requests for other formats too, but not nearly to this scale.

In looking at this from the reverse angle it sounds like documentation on how Microsoft has managed to ignore an overwhelming number of customer requests “for years”. Not something that I would really brag about.